Independent hosting market intelligence

Who owns Europe's hosting — and what it charges.

Size any operator's book on the same basis as its peers. Compare what a company says about ownership and scale with what the market shows. Watch a rival integrate what it bought. Price a market from offers captured in it. Every answer arrives sourced, naming the population it was measured on and what it does not prove.

Who owns the market once brands fold into their owners?
Hostnet→group.one
Loopia→team.blue
Domeneshop→Miss Group
brands resolve to current owners · validated acquisition ledger (263 acquisitions & mergers)
Hundreds of local brands. Far fewer owners. Owner-folded market structure changes who counts as leading — and by how much.
Book: control-plane, owner-folded as of 2026-09-27
Where do renewal prices diverge from entry offers?
90.4% of offers that state both prices renew higher. Median shared-hosting cliff: 3.0× — and the national norm runs from about twice the intro price in Switzerland and Austria to more than four times it in Denmark.
Book: 2022 tracked offers, 23 markets as of 2026-09-24
Evidence & caveats
Owner folds come from the validated, source-linked acquisition ledger; pricing from storefront offers captured in-market with dated evidence — a tracked subset, stated as such. Reproduce: market_concentration + market_pricing (free tier). Data version 2026-09-27.
actual product findings, restyled · more examples ↓
335M+web-provisioned every domain observed on the public web, globally
→
201M+web-active verified web-serving — on real hosting infrastructure, proven by the confirmed businesses it carries
→
141M+active domains the floor — headline claims use this, never the ceiling

A domain-level classification — not a count of companies or legal entities. Every number states the population it was measured on. European web hosting statistics →

The top tier is lower than it read last week: we had been counting names that sit under somebody else's domain as domains of their own, and they have been removed. A correction to our counting, not a change in the market - what changed and why.

263 validated acquisitions & mergers tracked (+28 other ledger events) · weekly refresh, calibrated against public registry totals · snapshot 2026-09-27 · versioned release

Decisions this changes

Each card is a call a team has to make anyway. The evidence behind it is one click away:

Ask the question a league table can't answer

A dashboard can tell you who is largest. The real work begins after that — and HostingBrain keeps the context with the answer, so analysis continues instead of restarting.

Not mockups — actual product output from the current snapshot, restyled for the page. Market structure is shown openly; forward-looking and provider-level intelligence is redacted here and named in the product.

How has the hosting-to-SaaS acquisition mix changed over time?
2019242020162021192022202023282024302025292026 YTD18
core hosting & domains adjacent SaaS / cloud / website tools
Adjacent deals (SaaS, cloud, website tools) were a minority of deal flow through 2020, closed the gap from 2021, and overtook core hosting and domains in 2025 — the market buying up-stack. 2026 is year-to-date (faded bar).
Evidence & caveats
Chart = dated consolidator-group transactions from 2019 onward. The full validated, source-linked ledger holds 291 events — 263 validated acquisitions & mergers plus 28 other tracked entries — including undated and pre-2019 ones, so chart counts are a floor. Each event carries its source URL in the product. Book: validated ledger events · direction, not a total market census.
actual output · snapshot 2026-09-27
Show me the ledger is real — a few source-linked examples.
A sample from the validated European consolidation ledger (public sources shown; the full ledger stays in the product):
yearacquirer grouptargetcategorysource
2020group.oneHostnethosting / domainscompany release
2024team.blueLoopia Grouphostingcompany release
2024Miss GroupDomeneshopdomains / registrarindustry press
2025World Host GroupA2 HostinghostingPR Newswire
2025team.blueAssoConnectSaaScompany release
acquisition_ledger · 5 of 263 validated, source-linked acquisitions & mergers · each row carries its source URL in the product
actual output · snapshot 2026-09-27

Six things a buyer needs to know

One product, six commercial questions: who leads a market, who owns whom, what has actually been integrated, what it costs, how good the book is, and what runs on it. Registrations, control, what a site serves and who owns the relationship are reconciled once — so the question picks the lens, not the data source:

Market structure

Rank operators on the right layer: customer relationship, hosting origin, email or web platform.

Ownership and consolidation

Fold brands into current owners and trace validated acquisition history.

Integration and migration

See whether acquired brands share networks, mail, DNS or platforms — ownership is not treated as integration.

Pricing intelligence

Compare entry offers, ladders, renewal cliffs and promotional mechanics across markets.

Book quality and movement

Separate active businesses from parked or inactive domains; observe directional provider movement without calling it measured churn.

Technology and distribution

Find CMS, commerce, email, security and SaaS provisioning patterns across operator books.

Explore the full platform →

Built for decisions, not browsing

Choose the workflow closest to the decision in front of you.

Where the claims stop

Every count names its population — the strictest is the floor of 141M+ active domains, and ownership claims trace to a validated source-linked acquisition ledger with 263 acquisitions and mergers. Known-bad values are withheld, series changes are declared and unknowns are reported as unknowns. HostingBrain is not a revenue estimate, a customer list or a legal register of ownership — the methodology states every boundary in full.

See the method at work

HostingBrain briefs turn a market question into a transparent analytical argument. Each brief shows the population, method, finding — and what the result does not prove.

All 16 analyst briefs → — every brief is reproducible through the connector, most on the free tier.

All briefs: The route checked out. It was still a forgery. · The same word, leader, two floors down · The measurements behind the Hosting Anatomy series · The AI web is one company · Buy first, integrate never · Three buyers, half the software deals · Three ways to sell a domain · Cheap first year. Then three times the price. · Half the domains have no website · Europe checks the mail. Nobody stops it. · Hosting customers don't leave · Whoever holds the domain, holds the customer · Nobody left hosting. They left the bundle. · The server moves. The customer doesn't. · Who really owns Europe's hosting · Where the new websites are going · About HostingBrain

Every European market is answerable through the connector today; thirteen have full worked-example pages. Country market pages → — concentration, market size and email posture per market.

All thirteen markets: Norway · Denmark · France · Sweden · Italy · United Kingdom · Germany · Czechia · Poland · Finland · Switzerland · Spain · Netherlands

Start exploring — free, no key needed

HostingBrain lives inside the AI assistant your team already uses. Add it once as a connector, sign in with Google when prompted, and ask your first question. The free tier covers market-level analysis, the methodology and 30 queries/day.

https://mcp.hostingbrain.ai/mcp

Set up Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients → — the same page issues API keys for scripts.

No Google account? Get a key by email

Your key is shown once, right here — no email round-trip.

FAQ

Is HostingBrain a customer database? No. HostingBrain observes domains, infrastructure, ownership, pricing and public technology signals. A domain is not automatically a unique customer, and every count identifies the population it measures.
Is nameserver share the same as hosting share? No. Nameservers describe the control-plane or relationship layer. The site may be served elsewhere, and CDN or cloud infrastructure can mask the origin — we separate the layers and say which one each number measures.
Can we cite findings in internal research or strategy materials? Depending on the plan and licence, internal use and exports with evidence attached are available. External publication, redistribution and derived-data rights are governed by the agreement.